COMPASS| Paper Name | Author(s) | Affiliation | Abstract |
|---|---|---|---|
| 'Ghostcrafting AI' Under the Rug of Platform Labor | ATM Mizanur Rahman, Sharifa Sultana | University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign | Platform laborers play an indispensable yet hidden role in building and sustaining AI systems. Drawing on an eight-month ethnography of Bangladesh's platform labor industry and inspired by Gray and Suri, we conceptualize Ghostcrafting AI to describe how workers materially enable AI while remaining invisible or erased from recognition. Workers pursue platform labor as a path to prestige and mobility but sustain themselves through resourceful, situated learning—renting cyber-café computers, copying gig templates, following tutorials in unfamiliar languages, and relying on peer networks. At the same time, they face exploitative wages, unreliable payments, biased algorithms, and governance structures that make their labor precarious and invisible. To cope, they develop tactical repertoires such as identity masking, bypassing platform fees, and pirated tools. These practices reveal both AI's dependency on ghostcrafted labor and the urgent need for design, policy, and governance interventions that ensure fairness, recognition, and sustainability in platform futures. |
| The Hidden Carbon Cost of Aligning AI: Carbon-Aware Scheduling for Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback | Saher Elsayed | University of Pennsylvania | The rapid deployment of large language models has intensified concerns about the environmental footprint of AI training. While substantial attention has been given to the carbon emissions of pretraining, the environmental cost of alignment processes such as Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) remains underexamined. This paper presents the first phase-resolved carbon characterization of RLHF and identifies Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) as the dominant contributor to alignment emissions, accounting for 59–64% of total carbon output across model scales. We introduce CarbonAware-RLHF, a carbon-aware scheduling framework that leverages real-time grid carbon intensity forecasts to shift, reorder, and selectively pause RLHF phases to lower-carbon windows. Across a 90-day multi-region evaluation spanning six power grids and 312 training jobs, our approach achieves a mean carbon reduction of 38.9% with negligible impact on alignment quality (−0.22 percentage points in reward model accuracy) and no statistically significant degradation in safety benchmarks. Our results demonstrate that alignment-phase emissions are both measurable and optimizable, and that carbon-aware scheduling can substantially reduce environmental impact without compromising model performance. This work provides an actionable systems-level pathway toward more sustainable AI alignment practices. |
| When Data Protection Fails to Protect: Law, Power, and Postcolonial Governance in Bangladesh | Pratyasha Saha, Anita Say Chan, Sharifa Sultana | University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, UIUC | Rapid digitization across government services, financial platforms, and telecommunications has intensified the collection and processing of large-scale personal data in Bangladesh. In response, the state has introduced multiple regulatory instruments, including the Personal Data Protection Ordinance, the Cyber Security Ordinance, and the National Data Governance Ordinance in 2025. While these initiatives signal an emerging legal regime for data protection, little scholarly work examines how these frameworks operate. This paper presents a legal and institutional analysis of Bangladesh’s emerging data protection regime through a systematic review of these three ordinances. Through this review, the paper provides an integrated mapping of Bangladesh’s evolving data protection framework and identifies key legal and institutional barriers that undermine the effective protection of citizens’ personal data. Our findings reveal that this emerging regime is constrained by limited institutional independence, uneven regulatory capacity, and the misaligned legal assumption of an individualized, autonomous data subject. Furthermore, these frameworks invisibilize prevalent sociotechnical realities, such as informal data flows and mediated access via “human bridges” - rendering formal protections difficult to operationalize. Ultimately, this paper contributes to HCI scholarship by expanding the concept of data protection as a complex sociotechnical design problem shaped by the informal infrastructures of the Global South. |
| DAIEM: Decolonizing Algorithm's Role as a Team-member in Informal E-market | Atm Mizanur Rahman, Md Romael Haque, Sharifa Sultana | University of Illinois, Purdue University Fort Wayne, UIUC | In Bangladesh’s rapidly expanding informal e-market, small-scale sellers use social media platforms like Facebook to run businesses outside formal infrastructures. These sellers rely heavily on platform algorithms—not just for visibility, but as active collaborators in business operations. Drawing on 41 in-depth interviews with sellers, buyers, and stakeholders, this paper examines how people in informal e-market perceive and interact with the algorithm as a " team member"; that performs sales, marketing, and customer engagement tasks. We found that while sellers and local tech entrepreneurs are intrigued to develop services to support this industry, buyers and investors of the industry put their greater trust in human interactions. This surfaces a postcolonial tension associated with cultural values, local tech education and training, and a mismatch between the global and Bangladeshi e-markets' growth. We expand this discussion from multiple ongoing HCI, political design, and AI design angles. We also address the postcolonial tension and support the decoloniality movement in informal e-markets by proposing the DAIEM framework that consists of six components: autonomy and agency; resistance; locality, culture, and history; rationality; materiality; and advocacy. Supporting the decoloniality and informality sentiment in informal e-market and other similar sectors, DAIEM will serve both as a guideline for algorithm design and as an analytical tool. |
| Credibility, Anonymity, and Algorithmic Gatekeeping in Leveraging Social Media as a Justice-Seeking Tool | Marshia Nujhat, Ahmed Mahir Ruhan, Sameha Kamrul, Pratyasha Saha, S M Taiabul Haque, Sharifa Sultana, Hasan Shahid Ferdous | BRAC University, Military Institute of Science and Technology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, University of Melbourne | Social media platforms increasingly function as informal infrastructures to seek justice in contexts where formal justice systems are inaccessible or distrusted. We examine how Bangladeshi individuals leverage Facebook to disclose personal experiences of harm (e.g., sexual harassment, fraud, and abuse) and pursue justice. Our in-depth interviews with 18 participants unpacked the motivations, strategic choices, and sociotechnical risks involved in such disclosures. Our participants carefully navigated trade-offs between visibility, credibility, privacy, and legal vulnerability. Our findings contribute to HCI by (1) conceptualizing justice-seeking behaviors in low-trust, high-risk environments; (2) offering empirical insights into post-curation, audience targeting, and identity management; and (3) identifying design opportunities for safer, more equitable platform interactions. We present implications for platform governance and moderation, including features that support credibility, mitigate emotional harm, and enhance the legibility of justice claims. This work advances critical HCI and social computing perspectives on safety, care, and power in digital participation. |
| Frugal Voice: Offline Community–Governed Speech Models for the Soliga Tribe in Karnataka | Sarbani Banerjee Belur, Nandha Sathiaseelan, Prashant Bannulmath, Sunil Saumya, Shruti Maralappanavar, Deepak K T, Mahadev Prasanna, Arjuna Sathiaseelan | IIIT Dharwad, Hills Road Sixth Form College, Cambridge Judge Business School | Low-resource and tribal languages in India are at acute risk of digital extinction because contemporary language technologies overwhelmingly target high-resource languages and centralized, cloud-hosted large models that are expensive to train, deploy, and adapt. Centralized automatic speech recognition (ASR) and text-to-speech (TTS) pipelines require large amounts of labelled data, stable connectivity, and significant compute resources, all of which are misaligned with the infrastructural realities and socio-economic conditions of many tribal communities in India. These constraints are particularly visible for the Soliga community, a Dravidian language-speaking tribe in the Biligiri Rangaswamy Hills of Karnataka, whose language has no widely used script and for which digital resources remain scarce. We present a socio-technical framework and prototype for building low-cost voice models with and for the Soliga tribe using offline, edge-based federated learning. The framework combines community-governed data collection and consent processes, on-device training of compact ASR and keyword-spotting models, and an intermittent-connectivity aggregation protocol that runs on low-cost edge hardware. Our experiments show that, even with only 5 hours of Soliga speech, a centralized Wav2Vec 2.0 baseline achieves a word error rate (WER) of 37.95% and character error rate (CER) of 11.11%, and that a federated frugal architecture trained on the same small corpus can approach this performance (WER 44.20%, CER 15.80%) while keeping data local and under community control. |
| Bangladesh AI Readiness: Gaps in Curriculum, Infrastructure, and Governance | Sharifa Sultana, Rupali Samad, Mehzabin Haque, Zinnat Sultana, Zulkarin Jahangir, B M Mainul Hossain, Rashed Mujib Noman, Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed | UIUC, University of Dhaka, S.M.R. Law College, North South University, Augmedix Bangladesh, University of Toronto | Artificial Intelligence (AI) readiness in the Global South is often framed as a matter of infrastructure gaps or policy ambition. Drawing on a multi-method qualitative study of 35 university programs, 59 stakeholder interviews, and curriculum benchmarking in Bangladesh, we reconceptualize AI readiness as a sociotechnical condition shaped by material infrastructures, human capacity, and curricular governance. Our findings reveal how GPU scarcity, limited faculty upskilling, opaque mentorship networks, entrenched gender disparities, and the near absence of Responsible AI instruction collectively constrain institutional capacity. Using concepts from Science and Technology Studies, including blackboxing, nested infrastructures, strain, and path dependency, we show that readiness deficits are not isolated shortcomings but outcomes of layered bureaucratic systems, historical lock-in, and global market dependencies. We further argue that AI education in Bangladesh is shaped by postcolonial dynamics that privilege global labor alignment over locally grounded innovation. We contribute an infrastructural reframing of AI readiness for HCI and ICTD, empirical evidence of institutional and epistemic barriers in a Global South context, and actionable design and policy pathways for building equitable, human-centered AI ecosystems. |
| From Satire to Misinformation: Visual Mimicry and Audience Interpretation of Fake News Photo-Cards in Bangladesh | Sabbir Bin Abdul Latif, Mohammad Rizwanul Islam, Zannatun Tazree, Tamanna Yesmin Maria | Computer Science, BRAC University, Computer Science and Engineering, BRAC University, Journalism, Media and Communication, Daffodil International University | In Bangladesh, "photo-cards", standardized news graphics widely shared on social media, have become a dominant format for news dissemination, but their visual authority is increasingly exploited to circulate misleading claims. This study examines how manipulated photo-cards imitate the branding of trusted news organizations and how audiences interpret these artifacts in online discussions. We conduct a qualitative analysis of 167 fake photo-cards collected from Facebook between November 2025 and March 2026, focusing on 20 artifacts that closely mimic the visual identity of major Bangladeshi news broadcasters and analyzing approximately 400 associated user comments. Our findings show that these artifacts replicate familiar layout and branding cues, allowing fabricated claims to borrow the visual credibility of established media institutions. Comment discourse reveals that most users initially react to the claim rather than questioning authenticity, while only a small fraction attempt correction. These results highlight how visual familiarity, cognitive heuristics, and social interaction shape the interpretation of misinformation in mobile-first environments. |
| "Wish We Could Study in Our Mother Tongue": Exploring Indigenous Primary Education Barriers and Proposing Guidelines in Bangladesh | Jannatun Noor, Susmita Biswas, Tawsif Azhar, Sowmik Shovon Karmakar, Md. Nazrul Huda Shanto, Fiona E Jannat, S. M. Bayazid Hossain, A. B. M. Alim Al Islam | C2SG Research Group, CSE, UIU, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology | Indigenous children in Bangladesh’s Chittagong Hill Tracts (CHT) face persistent barriers to primary education, including language mismatch, economic constraints, and limited infrastructure. Prior work often frames these challenges as problems of access; however, we argue that educational inequality in this context is fundamentally mediated through social and institutional structures. We present a four-phase mixed-methods study (2021–2026) involving 146 participants across five stakeholder groups. Our findings show that learning is shaped not only by technology availability but by networks of intermediaries "such as teachers and community members" who mediate access, interpretation, and trust. We further identify how language mismatch contributes to gradual disengagement from classroom participation, and how uneven access to devices produces intermediary-dependent learning structures. Based on these insights, we contribute (1) a multi-phase, corroborative, multi-actor study and dataset on indigenous primary education in Bangladesh; (2) the concept of intermediary-mediated learning systems; (3) a theoretical account of gradual disengagement as epistemic exclusion; and (4) a distributed user model with system-level design principles for mediated learning contexts. |
| Mod-Guide: An LLM-based Content Moderation Feedback System to Address Insensitive Speech toward Indigenous Ethnic and Religious Minority Communities | Dipto Das, Achhiya Sultana, Ankit Singh Chauhan, Saadia Binte Alam, Mohammad Shidujaman, Shion Guha, Sunandan Chakraborty, Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed | Computer Science, University of Toronto, Independent University Bangladesh, Indiana University Indianapolis, University of Toronto | Language operates as a mechanism of both marginalization and resistance, especially for minority communities navigating insensitive and harmful speech online. As content moderation increasingly depends on large language models (LLMs), concerns arise about whether these systems can recognize culturally insensitive speech--language that disregards or marginalizes the cultural and religious perspectives of historically underrepresented communities, often through implicit erasure, misrepresentation, or normative framing, rather than overt hostility. Focusing on Bangladesh's Hindu and Chakma communities--the country's largest religious and Indigenous ethnic minorities, respectively--this paper investigates the epistemic limits of LLM-based moderation systems and explores methods for incorporating minority perspectives. We co-created a culturally grounded corpus of insensitive speech with community members and integrated their narratives into moderation pipelines using retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). Our tool, Mod-Guide, improves LLM sensitivity to minority viewpoints by leveraging contextual cues derived from lived experience. Through mixed-method evaluations involving both minority and majority participants, we demonstrate that RAG-enhanced moderation responses are more contextually accurate and perceived differently across ethnic lines. This work advances research in human-computer interaction, AI ethics, and social computing by foregrounding restorative justice and hermeneutical inclusion in the design of content moderation systems. |
| Of Nostalgia, Trust, and Intimacy: AI Tool Usage among the Undergraduate Students of Bangladesh in Nonacademic Contexts | Md. Alvi Islam Ratul, Faria Haque, Pratyasha Saha, Jannatun Noor, S M Taiabul Haque | BRAC University, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, C2SG Research Group, CSE, UIU | The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence and large language models have created a new dynamic of student engagement beyond academic contexts. While prior research focused on AI's role in providing academic and emotional support, less is known about the motivations to personalize AI, its diverse usage, and the intricate relationship between AI and the student population, especially in the context of the Global South. Our study fills this gap with findings drawn from 21 semi-structured interviews with undergraduate students from diverse backgrounds in Bangladesh, revealing usage as companionship, intimate partnership, worldbuilding, reminiscence of dead family members, and prioritization of AI over human relationships. These findings shed light accounting the local cultural norms on shaping AI adoption in Bangladesh, highlighting both opportunities and risks, and provide essential insights to inform necessary guidelines. We further connect our findings to the broader issues in Human-AI interaction and offer future research directions. |
| Machiaruki or Machizukuri? Staged Co-design in the Development of """dédédé""" | Yuichiro Takeuchi, Kenya Hoshimure, Masaya Narita, Yoshihito Katayama, Yuya Tanaka, Masayuki Fukutomi, Ikuta Tsuda, Dowon Kim, Toshihiko Abe | Wikitopia Research, Osaka University, Kyoto Institute of Technology, Tunagum, Homo Sapiens, The Kyoto Shinkin Bank, Ritsumeikan University | Civic technology platforms are increasingly developed through collaborative processes involving diverse stakeholders, yet existing participatory design literature is largely shaped by a canonical model in which collaboration is structured and intentional from the outset. This paper presents a reflective account of the development of """dédédé""", an online platform that invites citizens to informally document and share observations about their neighborhoods. The platform was initially conceived and developed by a small team of technologists, then evolved through two co-design phases involving progressively broader stakeholder communities — first with urban designers and other practitioners experienced in facilitating machiaruki ("town-walking") workshops, then with city officials and real estate developers interested in leveraging the platform for machizukuri ("town-building") efforts. We show that these phases produced qualitatively distinct collaborative dynamics: the first characterized by receptive redesign, in which domain expertise corrected the implicit assumptions of the technical team; the second by active negotiation and resistance, in which the design knowledge accumulated in the first phase became a resource (design anchor) for mediating competing stakeholder visions. We argue that such staged co-design processes represent a recognizable and undertheorized mode of civic technology development, with distinct benefits and risks that merit attention. |
| Asset Maps & the Digitization of Rural Development: Designing for Sustainable Opportunity | Jean Hardy, Nelly Aghaei | Michigan State University | Recent geographic shifts in high-tech labor markets have redirected attention toward economic growth in small cities and rural regions across the United States. We examine how this shift has spurred economic development organizations, think tanks, and rural municipalities to leverage digital data in local economies as a strategic tool for attracting investment. Drawing on research on rural development policy and practice, we turn to the design of a new type of development tool: the digital asset map. In this paper, we describe how nationwide mapping and data visualization initiatives push for the digitization of rural community-based asset data, from broadband infrastructure to breweries. While these systems are intended to promote sustainable rural development, and to help leaders in their efforts to repopulate and revitalize rural communities in decline, their design often encourages comparison across communities in ways that reify divides between the rural “haves” and “have-nots”. By privileging quantifiable data, digital asset maps risk marginalizing communities whose strengths are less easily captured in datasets, potentially reinforcing existing patterns of uneven rural development. |
| How do datasets, developers, and models affect biases in a low-resourced language? | Dipto Das, Shion Guha, Bryan Semaan | University of Toronto, University of Colorado Boulder | Sociotechnical systems, such as language technologies, frequently exhibit identity-based biases. These biases exacerbate the experiences of historically marginalized communities and remain understudied in low-resource contexts. While models and datasets specific to a language or with multilingual support are commonly recommended to address these biases, this paper empirically tests the effectiveness of such approaches for gender, religion, and nationality-based identities in Bengali, a widely spoken but low-resourced language. We conducted an algorithmic audit of sentiment analysis models built on mBERT and BanglaBERT, which were fine-tuned using all Bengali sentiment analysis (BSA) datasets from Google Dataset Search. Our analyses showed that BSA models exhibit biases across different identity categories despite having similar semantic content and structure. We also examined the inconsistencies and uncertainties arising from combining pre-trained models and datasets created by individuals from diverse demographic backgrounds. We connected these findings to the broader discussions on epistemic injustice, AI alignment, and methodological decisions in algorithmic audits. |
| Quantifying Regional AI Readiness Disparities: An Empirical Analysis of Indian States | Nandha Sathiaseelan, Jaideep Prabhu | Hills Road Sixth Form College, Cambridge Judge Business School | While global debates on Artificial Intelligence (AI) often focus on existential risks, a more immediate concern for developing economies is that uneven AI adoption will deepen existing regional inequalities. This paper presents a state-level empirical analysis of AI readiness disparities within India, quantifying how structural preparedness and public interest in AI co-vary across 28 states and the National Capital Territory of Delhi. We construct an AI Readiness Composite Score (AIRCS) that integrates educational outcomes, economic capacity, and digital infrastructure, and relate it to a normalised AI interest index derived from Google Trends data for AI-related search terms. The results show a positive but far from deterministic association between readiness and interest. Building on this joint distribution, we identify four readiness–interest profiles: high readiness and high interest leaders, high interest and medium readiness aspirants, low readiness and low interest priority states, and a large band of medium readiness and medium interest regions that track the national average relationship. This typology reveals that AI-driven growth is likely to follow a highly uneven spatial pattern, in which a small number of states are positioned to capture disproportionate benefits while others risk long-term exclusion. We argue that national AI strategies premised on universal digitalisation are unlikely to correct these imbalances. Instead, we propose a contextual integration framework in which AI policies, investments, and applications are tailored to the specific readiness and interest profiles of different state clusters, with the goal of preventing a new, AI-intensive layer of the digital divide from emerging within India. |
| From Restriction to Empowerment: Responsible AI Governance in Higher Education | A. H. B. Sirajul Monir Akib, Mohammad Aseer Intisar, Md. Sabbir Ahmed, Marshia Nujhat, Farida Chowdhury | BRAC University | Generative AI tools have entered university life faster than institutions have been able to govern them, prompting policy responses that range from outright prohibition to largely unguided adoption. This paper examines the shift from restrictive to empowerment-oriented AI governance in higher education through a convergent parallel mixed-methods study comprising a structured survey ($n=71$) and twenty-five semi-structured interviews across eleven academic disciplines at a private university in Bangladesh. The study documents patterns of AI adoption, stakeholder attitudes toward institutional policy, and barriers to responsible use. Participants situated within more empowerment-oriented institutional environments, including those characterised by AI literacy support, clearer ethical guidance, and stronger faculty engagement, reported greater confidence in using AI responsibly and clearer understanding of acceptable practices. By contrast, participants operating under restriction-only policies more often described uncertainty, confusion, and rule evasion. Regression analysis further showed that AI familiarity, frequency of use, and policy awareness were significantly associated with stronger support for empowerment-oriented governance. These findings inform a five-pillar framework for responsible AI integration encompassing AI Literacy Integration, Stage-Based Access, Transparent Use Norms, Assessment Innovation, and Faculty Development. Informed by stakeholder evidence and refined in dialogue with existing literature, the framework offers a practical model for institutions navigating AI governance in resource-constrained contexts. The paper contributes empirical evidence from a developing-country setting that remains underrepresented in current scholarship and highlights how responsible AI governance can support more equitable and context-sensitive higher education. |
| Co-Designing Technology-Supported Air Quality Communication: A case study about Integrating Design Thinking, Behavioural Science, and Participatory Approaches | Roberto Cibin, Laura Horgan, Chaitra Reddy, Clara Felberbauer, Lugina Ciolfi, Gillian Murphy, Samantha Dockray, Ian Pitt, Denise Cahill, Kevin Ryan, Dean S. Venables, Marica Cassarino | School of Applied Psychology, University College Cork + Lero - The Research Ireland Centre for Software, Limerick, Ireland, School of Applied Psychology, University College Cork, Centre for Research into Atmospheric Chemistry, School of Chemistry, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland, Air Quality Unit, Environment Section, Cork City Council, Cork, Ireland, School of Computer Science, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland, Cork Healthy Cities, Health Service Executive, Cork, Ireland, Centre for Research into Atmospheric Chemistry, School of Chemistry, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland + UCC Sustainability Institute, Cork, Ireland, School of Applied Psychology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland + UCC Sustainability Institute, Cork, Ireland | Air pollution poses significant health, social, and economic risks, necessitating effective communication to promote awareness and behavioural adaptation. This study explores how co-design can shape public engagement with air quality (AQ) information through technology. Drawing on behavioural science and science communication, we conducted 11 workshops involving 169 participants to investigate how engagement techniques influence participation in design, and how people represent and negotiate environmental data and technology. Our methodology combined education, storytelling, user testing, and participatory design to foster an inclusive space for learning and dialogue. Findings highlight that AQ communication is entangled with questions of data usability, trust and environmental literacy. Participants emphasised the importance of audience-specific AQ messaging, integrating AQ technical data with comprehensible visualisations, and combining persuasive communication with evidence-based information. Tensions emerged between individual adaptive behaviours and structural barriers, reinforcing the socio-ecological complexity of AQ communication. Challenges included involving underrepresented groups and assessing long-term impacts of interventions. The findings offer insights into how public engagement can be utilised to inform the design of an AQ communication technology to support protective and sustainable behaviours. Future research should explore ways to enhance inclusivity, refine message design for different user groups, and assess the impact of participatory AQ communication initiatives. |
| Learning Bird Migration Models from Marginals with Site Fidelity and Long-Range Dependencies | Miguel Fuentes, Jacob Epstein, Ethan Plunkett, Yangkang Chen, Yuting Deng, David Slager, Adriaan Dokter, Benjamin Van Doren, Daniel Sheldon | University of Massachusetts Amherst, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Understanding bird migration across full annual cycles is critical for effective conservation. The recent BirdFlow framework allows researchers to model population-scale migration without physical tracking tags by inferring likely flight paths from weekly population snapshots (such as eBird abundance maps). However, the original framework is Markovian, meaning it assumes a bird's next move depends only on its current location, completely ignoring its history. Because of this short-term focus, the model cannot capture essential year-long biological behaviors, most notably annual site fidelity, where birds return to the exact same breeding or wintering grounds year after year. In this paper, we extend this framework by introducing "loop" and "nested loop" graphical models. These new structures explicitly connect distant time steps, allowing the model to remember and enforce long-range dependencies across an entire year. In general, graphical model inference and learning become exponentially more expensive as graph structures become more complex. For this type of spatial modeling, the key parameter is $n$, the number of grid cells in the map. To solve this, we developed custom algorithms that keep the initial model-training cost manageable ($O(n^3)$) while ensuring that generating forecasts and simulating tracks remains feasible for interactive use ($O(n^2)$). Empirical evaluations on tracking data from four North American bird species demonstrate that our proposed models successfully enforce annual site fidelity without compromising short-term forecasting accuracy. Ultimately, these new models provide a highly scalable, biologically realistic tool for tracking how bird populations move and interact across different seasons. |
| "Had to Use My Guts": Epistemic Agency and Selective Appropriation in Community-Led Digital Agricultural Education with Migrant Workers | Olivia Doggett, Gabriel Allahdua, Timothy Bernard, Matt Ratto, Priyank Chandra | University of Toronto, Association for the Rights of Household and Farm Workers, Unaffiliated | Digital agriculture research and design has largely overlooked migrant and smallholder farmers, reproducing narrow visions of who agricultural technology is for and whose knowledge counts. We address this through a community-based participatory research study that centers Caribbean temporary foreign workers as leaders of their own digital agricultural education. Working with two migrant community leaders, we co-designed and analyzed a hands-on soil health workshop with 34 Caribbean greenhouse workers in Ontario, Canada, using tomato plants as transnational boundary objects for dialogical learning between embodied agricultural knowledge from Caribbean smallholder farms and scientific knowledge from Canadian high-tech greenhouses. We find that: (1) community-led facilitation produced unplanned but generative knowledge translation work, as facilitators drew on shared cultural and farming backgrounds to bridge participants' lived expertise and scientific soil principles; and (2) participants engaged with precision agriculture tools through selective appropriation under infrastructural constraint, integrating new knowledge on their own terms in relation to their agricultural values, lived temporalities, and the material realities of Caribbean farming contexts. Our contributions are threefold: we offer an empirical model for community-led digital education with migrant workers; we develop selective appropriation under infrastructural constraint as a concept; and we extend boundary objects and infrastructural inversion as pedagogical tools activated through community-led facilitation. |
| "Is This Not Enough?": Asymmetries in Institutional Accountability and Collective Sensemaking in the Case of Canada's Algorithmic Visa Triage System | Dipto Das, Matthew Tamura, Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, Shion Guha | University of Toronto | This paper examines how algorithmic accountability in Canada's visa system is articulated institutionally and experienced by applicants across borders. We analyzed Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC)'s Algorithmic Impact Assessment (AIA) for the temporary resident visa (TRV) triage system using the algorithmic decision-making adapted for the public sector (ADMAPS) framework and analyzed Reddit discussions among applicants using a mixed-methods approach. We show that while institutional artifacts emphasize transparency, procedural safeguards, and bounded impacts, applicants engage in collective sensemaking to interpret opaque decisions, often relying on peer knowledge amid uncertainty. We identify three asymmetries between how institutional accountability is structured and how people perceive the process: epistemic asymmetry in access to decision logic, jurisdictional asymmetry in exposure shaped by geopolitical positioning, and temporal--relational asymmetry in how waiting and uncertainty are experienced. We emphasize why it is important to shift attention from institutional design to the uneven distribution of experiences with public-sector algorithmic governance. Together, these contributions demonstrate how algorithmic governance systems in the context of transnational migration produce structured asymmetries not captured by institutional disclosure frameworks, and how extending ADMAPS can account for those uneven translations of accountability. |
| Embedding sustainability in IT degree programs: Stakeholder perspectives and curriculum strategies | Sarah Webber, Madeleine Antonellos, Lucy Sparrow, Simon Coghlan, Sarah Schombs | The University of Melbourne | Despite the importance of the Information Technology (IT) sector for sustainability, there is a lack of guidance for including Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) in IT degree programs. This research investigates perspectives of staff, students and industry, and contextual factors, to develop strategies for embedding sustainability in IT curricula. We conducted a case study at an IT department in a major Australian university, through semi-structured interviews and workshops with academic staff (n=10), students (n=28), and industry professionals (n=5), and by analysing documentation such as university plans, handbooks and company reports. A thematic analysis was used to synthesise perspectives, and sustainability topics were mapped to IT knowledge areas. While IT professionals have increasingly important roles in addressing sustainability challenges, many IT staff and students are unaware of, or uncertain about, sustainability's relevance to their field. Additional barriers to integrating sustainability into IT programs include lack of educator expertise, overcrowded curricula, and the lack of tailored resources and support. We offer an empirical account of stakeholder perspectives on integrating sustainability into IT curricula in Australia. We provide a framework and recommendations to address these issues through loose, program-level coordination, training and resources to empower educators, paving the way for more profound change. This case study offers valuable insights for integrating sustainability into IT curricula, along with a framework and strategies that can serve as useful starting points for universities to take practical, educator-led steps towards ESD. |
| Staying with Friction: Designing Community-Based Communication Infrastructures under Climate Disruption | Jen Liu, Monique Verdin, Jenna Mae, Ozone 504 | University of Toronto, Bvlbancha Liberation Radio | Digital and computing infrastructures are increasingly vulnerable to the intensifying effects of climate change, with extreme events like hurricanes, wildfires, and winter storms disrupting communication systems for extended periods. These disruptions reflect longstanding inequities in how infrastructures are built, maintained, and distributed. While sustainable computing research has begun to address environmental impacts through energy efficiency and alternative system design, less attention has been paid to how infrastructures fail under climate stress and how these failures are socially different. In this paper, we present a reflexive ethnographic case study of designing a community-based emergency communication network with a mutual aid community in New Orleans, Louisiana. We introduce friction as an analytic lens to examine the challenges and tensions that arise when building alternative infrastructures within existing systems. Our findings identify three forms of friction: infrastructural, spatial, and epistemic. These frictions emerge through interactions with institutional systems, urban environments, uneven expertise, and material dependencies. Rather than treating friction as a barrier to be resolved, we argue for “staying with friction” as an ethical and methodological commitment by attending to how friction shapes what can be built, how systems are sustained, and how alternative infrastructures are imagined. This perspective reframes sustainable computing beyond technical optimization to include maintenance, accessibility, and collective stewardship under conditions of climate instability. By attending to friction, we show how community-based infrastructures are not designed outside existing systems, but are negotiated within them, opening possibilities for more socially just and resilient forms of computing. |
| Emotional Power and Communicating about Climate Change: Engaging Urban People with Bushfire | Madeleine Antonellos, Nic Bidwell, Sarah Webber | Charles Darwin University, Australia and The University of Melbourne, Australia, Charles Darwin University, Australia and Rhodes University, South Africa, The University of Melbourne, Australia | Amidst escalating global concern about the intensification of bushfire (wildfire), we investigate how interactive, data-driven articles shape people’s engagement with this expanding environmental crisis. We build on critical discourse that positions climate informatics products as sociopolitical actors, as well as research on polarisation in environmental communication, through an empirical study of bushfire news coverage and its reception by urban Australians. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 7 fire science experts and 12 city-dwellers, who engaged with three interactive news articles. Our analysis highlights the challenges of navigating uncertainty, polarised and shifting discourse, and the emotional burden of bushfire communication. We show that engagement is shaped by a dynamic interplay between affective and cognitive sense-making, which can both motivate and inhibit attention. Participants expressed a desire for actionable, place-relevant information, yet often encountered barriers in interpreting complex or ambiguous visualisations. Based on these findings, we identify design opportunities for interactive articles that (1) respond to audiences’ existing exposure to environmental discourse, (2) scaffold engagement with uncertainty, (3) connect audiences with distant people and places, and (4) support pathways to collective action. |
| Framing Migration News with LLMs: Structured CoT as a Support for Human Interpretation | David Alonso del Barrio, Jing Wen, Daniel Gatica-Perez | Idiap Research Institute, Idiap Research Institute and University of Geneva, Idiap Research Institute - EPFL | Frame analysis of migration news is a socially consequential task: media scholars and researchers who study how migration is narrated need tools that are not only accurate, but transparent, auditable, and accessible within the resource constraints typical of academic research groups. Existing LLM-based approaches rely on proprietary APIs and large models that raise concerns about data privacy, reproducibility and equitable access among media researchers. This work studies how a locally deployable open-source LLM can support interpretable frame analysis as an assistive tool. We introduce a Structured Chain-of-Thought (SCoT) prompting approach using LLama 3-8B, enabling step-by-step justifications grounded in predefined framing categories. This structured design allows users to audit model outputs and examine alternative interpretations in a task that is inherently subjective. We evaluate our approach on a dataset of migration-related news and show that SCoT improves classification performance over zero-shot and few-shot baselines while remaining feasible on a single GPU. Then, we conduct a human-centered evaluation in which annotators assess the coherence and influence of ``the model's reasoning". Results indicate that SCoT explanations are generally perceived as logical (mean score 4.1/5, though with notable variation across texts) and can prompt reflection on initial interpretations, even when disagreement persists. Our findings highlight both the potential and risks of LLM-assisted frame analysis. While structured reasoning can increase the traceability of model outputs and support critical interpretation, it can also influence human judgment in subtle ways. By enabling local deployment and emphasizing human-in-the-loop interaction, this work contributes to discussions on responsible and accessible computational tools for the study of socially impactful media narratives. |
| From Agent Dependency to Financial Autonomy: Smartphone based Inclusive MFS Design for Low-Literate Population | Yousuf Abdullah Harun, Asiful Islam Chowdhury, Nurshida Akter Nilima, Hafsa Bintey Alim, Ashfiqun Ahmed Miftah, Md Ishmam Tasin, S M TAIABUL HAQUE, Farida Chowdhury | BRAC University | Mobile Financial Services (MFS) have rapidly expanded digital service access in growing regions of internet use, yet low-literate users remain systematically excluded due to text-heavy interfaces, complex security features, and a lack of inclusive design. Through semi-structured interviews with 40 low-literate MFS users in Bangladesh, we identified critical barriers: frequent transaction errors, agent dependency driven by PIN sharing (72.5% prevalence), and usability challenges from conventional app interfaces. Informed by these findings, we designed and developed EKASH, a simplified MFS application featuring icon-driven navigation, multilingual audio guidance in Bengali, and mandatory re-confirmation before each transaction. A task-based usability evaluation with 43 low-literate participants showed potential for improving the major task completion (86.5% average task completion), 76% reduction in transaction errors, and 89% user satisfaction. We discuss design implications for smartphone enabled inclusive FinTech in low-literacy, low-resource contexts. |
| SpheriCity: Designing Trustworthy Conversational AI for Sustainability Decision Support | Ahmed Qayyum, Madison Werner, Kathryn Youngblood, Jenna R. Jambeck, Tahiya Chowdhury | Colby College, Circularity Informatics Lab, University of Georgia | We present SpheriCity, an expert-grounded conversational prototype designed to support trustworthy knowledge sensemaking from sustainability reports. City-level circularity assessment reports contain rich information about materials, infrastructure, and policy interventions, yet their length and heterogeneous structure make cross-document synthesis and comparison difficult for practitioners and researchers working on circular economy initiatives. While large language models (LLM) promise faster knowledge access and synthesis, their opaque reasoning, hallucinations, and lack of source transparency introduce risks for trust, and interpretability and require verification in high-stakes sustainability contexts. SpheriCity addresses these challenges through a provenance-first conversational agent that foregrounds evidence traceability, structured synthesis, and interaction scaffolds to support exploratory querying across reports to assess the impact of potential decisions. We conducted a formative expert review with six sustainability experts using representative queries spanning cross-city comparison, policy summarization, and recommendation-oriented tasks. Experts evaluated responses across dimensions, including relevance, contextual fit, accuracy, neutrality, and depth, and provided qualitative reflections on the system’s usefulness for sustainability knowledge work. Our results reveal that transparent sourcing, contextual explanation, interpretability, and alignment with expert workflow strongly shape expert trust and judgments of system usefulness. This work contributes (1) a conversational prototype for sustainability knowledge sensemaking, (2) an expert-grounded evaluation framework for assessing AI responses in high-stakes knowledge domains, and (3) design insights into how provenance, uncertainty communication, and integration in workflow influence expert users' trust in AI assistance for sustainability decision support. |